Wednesday, August 27, 2014

Stop the Attacks on Pres. Aristide and Haitian Democracy


With thanks to the Alliance for Global Justice. The ongoing struggle in Haiti has not received the attention from the US left that it deserves. This article is reprinted from their website. Please check it out. http://afgj.org/

Former President of Haiti Jean-Bertrand Aristide is bing targeted for harassment by the government of current President Michel Martelly. The US supported Martelly regime is pursuing trumped up charges of corruption against Aristide in an attempt to further intimidate Haiti's pro-democracy movement. Pres. Aristide was overthrown in a 2004 coup that was organized and coordinated with US government funding via the International Republican Institute and its partners in the National Endowment for Democracy (NED). The NED is a US Congress created and funded organization that tries to manipulate the electoral affairs of foreign governments.
CLICK HERE to email a sample letter (or write your own!) to the Haitian Embassy and the Western Hemisphere Bureau of the US State Department.

FOLLOWING IS A MORE IN DEPTH REPORT ON THE ATTACKS ON PRESIDENT ARISTIDE

Stop The Attacks On Former Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and the Lavalas Movement

An Urgent Call from Haiti Action Committee

On August 13, the Haitian government summoned former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide to court on corruption charges. This summons is part of a chilling pattern of repression aimed at destroying Aristide’s political party, Fanmi Lavalas, as the country approaches new legislative elections. We denounce it in the strongest possible terms.

 On March 18, 2011, tens of thousands of people followed President Aristide’s car as it drove from the airport to his home, following his return from seven years of forced exile. They then climbed over the walls into the courtyard of the Aristides’ residence to continue an emotional and heart-felt greeting for Haiti’s first democratically elected president, overthrown in a U.S.-orchestrated coup in 2004. In his speech at the airport, President Aristide focused on education and the importance of inclusion for all Haitians in the process of restoring democracy.

Since his return, President Aristide has done exactly what he promised to do – reopen the University of the Aristide Foundation (UNIFA). On September 26, 2011 the Medical School once again opened its doors. Today, there are over 900 students studying medicine, nursing and law at a University whose mission is to provide higher education to all sectors of Haitian society, not just the children of the rich.

 And yet, in spite of this powerful and important work, Aristide and other Lavalas leaders and activists remain the target of government harassment and attack. This is not surprising; after all, the Haitian government of Michel Martelly came to power after elections with a historically low turnout in which Fanmi Lavalas, Haiti’s most popular political party, was banned from participation.

Martelly has embraced Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier, the former Haitian dictator. Human rights organizations estimate that the Duvaliers – “Papa Doc” and “Baby Doc” – were responsible for the deaths of over 30,000 Haitian citizens during their 29-year rule. While Duvalier now lives freely in Haiti and was honored by Martelly at the January 1st 2014 Haitian Independence Day celebrations, President Aristide and the democratic movement are under assault.

For over a decade, U.S. and Haitian authorities have periodically threatened President Aristide with indictment and “tried” him in the pages of a compliant media. None of these charges has stuck, for the simple reason that they are all lies. This is the third time since his return in 2011 that Haitian authorities have trumpeted charges against President Aristide. Each time, after sensational headlines, the cases were unceremoniously shelved after an initial hearing and interview, before President Aristide could even challenge the accusations.

 The politicized nature of the charges is further evidenced by the history of the judge in the case, Lamarre Bélizaire. The Port-au-Prince Bar Association has suspended Bélizaire for ten years from the practice of law (the suspension to begin once he steps down as judge) for using the court to persecute opponents of the Martelly regime. This latest summons is one more example of a government determined to derail any opposition.

 Each time these charges are trotted out, the goal is to defame Aristide, weaken Lavalas and endanger the vital educational work that he has led since his return. Haiti’s grassroots movement knows that each new rumored indictment is part of a campaign to intimidate and silence them. When President Aristide was last called to court, thousands of people surrounded the courthouse, chanting: “If they call our brother, they call all of us.” Yesterday, once again, people took to the streets to show him their support.
We echo their voices. Enough is enough. It is time for education, health care, and democratic development in Haiti, not a resurgence of political repression. We call on the Haitian government to withdraw this warrant.
Sent by Haiti Action Committee
www.haitisolidarity.net

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Marikana, Gaza, Ferguson: 'You should think of them always as armed' :: SACSIS.org.za

By Richard Pithouse · 18 Aug 2014

In colonial wars the occupying power invariably reaches a point where it has to acknowledge that its true enemy is not a minority - devil worshipers, communists, fanatics or terrorists - subject to external and evil manipulation, but the people as a whole. Once this point is reached every colonised person is taken as a potential combatant and the neighbourhood and the home are cast as legitimate sites of combat.

This is the moment when liberal paternalism breaks down.

From its first stirrings liberalism has often managed the contradiction between this reality and its affirmation of liberty by limiting its reach in both spatial and racial terms. The rules that were understood to apply in England or France were not applied on the slave plantations of America or the Caribbean or, more recently, during the colonial wars in Kenya or Algeria. The same is true in Gaza today.

Picture credit: A protester in in Ferguson, Missouri courtesy Bilde.

But as Aimé Césaire argued in 1955, in an essay first published in Paris, colonialism has a ‘boomerang effect’ – what is done over there will eventually be done at home, usually to a group of people that has been raced out of the count of who is taken as an authentic citizen with full rights to presence. On the 17th of October 1961, as the Algerian war against French colonialism was coming to an end, thousands of Algerians, between thirty and forty thousand men, women and children, dressed in their best clothes, marched in Paris in protest at a curfew on Algerians. Before the march Maurice Papon, the chief of police who had been a collaborator with the Nazis during the Second World War, informed his officers that “Even if the Algerians are not armed, you should think of them always as armed.”

The marchers were met with a savage police attack. People were thrown into the Seine, some dead, others bloodied but still alive. Some were taken to the police headquarters and beaten to the death in the courtyard. Others were taken to sport stadiums and left to die without medical attention. For years there was simply no discussion of this in France. One result of this long silence is that the exact number of people murdered by the police on that day is not clear. Credible estimates range up to 200.

Colonial powers have always shared what they have learnt about oppression. Some of the people that tortured for apartheid learnt their skills from the French who had made torture a routine feature of their attempt to contain resistance to colonialism in Algerian. Colonised people have also always shared their knowledge about how to resist oppression. In 1962 Nelson Mandela went to newly independent Algeria to be trained as a soldier.

From the eighteenth century it was, perhaps more than anyone else, sailors who spread revolt from port to port. In 1804 African slaves won their freedom in Haiti. For years later slaves, ripped from around the world and thrown together in Cape Town, unfurled the banner of revolt in Cape Town. The docks in Cape Town would remain a site of subversive exchange until at least the early twentieth century when sailors bought anarchist, communist and Garveyist ideas into dialogue with more local experiences and ideas sparking the emergence of the Industrial and Commercial workers’ Union, which, as it spread from Cape Town, through the Eastern Cape to Durban and as far as what are now the independent states of Namibia, Zimbabwe and Zambia, became at various points, a trade union, a peasant movement and a shack dwellers’ movement.

Today the zones where enduring colonial power relations take their most extreme forms, places like Palestine and Haiti, are not solely sites of egregious oppression. They are also laboratories where new modes of oppression are tested. The Brazilian soldiers that were part of the United Nations occupation of Haiti and played a part in crushing the movement for democracy and justice in the shack settlements of Port-au-Prince returned home to occupy the favelas in Rio. The Israeli state sells the technologies it has tested in Palestine, and it and consultants linked to it train police officers, soldiers and private security companies from other countries. The lessons learnt in Gaza will be shared with the with the security apparatus from Johannesburg to Paris and New York as old forms of domination are modernised.

When the overwhelmingly white police department in Ferguson, Missouri, some of whom are Israeli trained, responded to protest at their murder of Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, they brought in equipment first used in the Iraq war. The images that rushed around the world showed what can only be understood as a mode of policing rooted in contemporary forms of imperial and colonial power in the Middle East, as well as the long history of state violence against black people in the United States. Unsurprisingly people in Gaza started sending advice to people in Ferguson via twitter about how to deal with stun grenades, tear gas and all the rest. Messages of support were sent from Gaza to Ferguson.

In our own country it cannot be denied that our own police, equipped in part from Israel, approach some of our fellow citizens as if they were the enemy in a colonial war. Nobody who has seen the footage of the Marikana massacre, or an eviction at the Marikana Land Occupation in Durban, can have any doubt about this. And as in Gaza, or Ferguson, the evident coloniality of some forms of contemporary state power is not simply a matter of the subordination of social questions to a military logic. Just as the same water cannons are used in Gaza, Port-au-Prince and Ferguson, as well as the shack lands of Brazil and South Africa, so too are the same ideological operations are repeated, albeit with different key words, around the world. The person who is always treated as if they are armed, whose life counts for nothing, whose home has no sanctity, is a terrorist in Gaza, a gangster or a criminal in Port-au-Prince, Ferguson, Rio or Durban. In Gaza the people are conflated with Hamas, in Port-au-Prince its Aristide and Lavalas. Here it’s the third force.

The impunity of the Israeli state, like the impunity of the American state, like the impunity with which our own state increasingly uses murder, and legitimates the use of murder as a tool of social control, must be smashed. The militarization of social questions must be smashed everywhere. If not what is done in Haiti will continue to boomerang into Brazil. It will continue to become part of the standard mechanisms to police the urban poor from Bombay to Johannesburg. What is done in Palestine will boomerang into the suburbs of Paris, the ghettos of the United States and the places where striking workers gather, and the dispossessed occupy land, in our own country.
Dr. Pithouse teaches politics at Rhodes University.
Should you wish to republish this SACSIS article, please attribute the author and cite The South African Civil Society Information Service as its source.

Monday, August 18, 2014

Protests erupt in Missouri after another police murder

Posted on by Jamala Rogers, from the Freedom Road Socialist Org website:  http://freedomroad.org/
Protestors in Ferguson confront police with hands raised to show they are unarmed. Michael Brown was shot and killed while doing the same.
Protestors in Ferguson confront police with hands raised to show they are unarmed. Michael Brown was shot and killed while doing the same.
 
Evidence is still being collected and facts sifted through as I write but what we are absolutely clear on is that a black, unarmed teen was murdered by a Ferguson cop yesterday. Ferguson is a one of many municipalities that make up St. Louis County in Missouri.

Michael Brown was visiting his grandmother at the Canfield Green apartment complex when the tragedy occurred. Details are sketchy but most eye-witnesses tell the same sad story: When accosted by the Ferguson police, Mike raised his hands to show that he was unarmed. Shots ranged out. He raised his hands again to show “compliance” and police fired again, killing him.

This cold-blooded murder of a black youth created instant rage. The word went out through social media and crowds began to gather demanding justice. Multiple police departments were deployed in response, armed with M16s as armored trucks rumbled down neighborhood streets. Community organizers from the Organization for Black Struggle and other groups rushed to the scene to support the family and residents, prepared to give leadership if necessary.

The scenario of young, black men being gunned down in America is nothing new. Not long ago, Carey Ball had a similar encounter with the St. Louis Police Department; he was shot 25 times with his arms up. It’s part of a strategy of racist repression in the urban centers where the sight of black people in general (remember Renisha McBride) and black men in particular, signal fear and danger.
Another march in Ferguson protesting Michael Brown's murder
Another march in Ferguson protesting Michael Brown’s murder.

There are a series of protests and vigils planned in response to the police murder but communities are weary of appealing to the entities that are responsible for or which uphold state violence—police departments, the FBI, the Justice Department, etc. It’s time to craft a more sophisticated approach to police violence that is proactive and impactful.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

A Bill to Get the Labor Movement Back on Offense

Representatives Keith Ellison and John Lewis plan to introduce a bill Wednesday that would make labor organizing a basic freedom no different than freedom from racial discrimination. The legislation would amend the National Labor Relations Act to include protections found under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to include labor organizing as a fundamental right.
George Zornick
 
July 28, 2014
 
Public sector workers rallying in solidarity with Wisconsin workers outside Los Angeles City Hall
AP Photo/Jason Redmond

For years, the American labor movement has been on the defensive as it has become harder and harder for workers to join or maintain a union. But some House Democrats are planning a dramatic counter-offensive: a bill that would make union organizing a civil right.

Representatives Keith Ellison and John Lewis plan to introduce a bill Wednesday that would make labor organizing a basic freedom no different than freedom from racial discrimination. That sounds like a nice talking point—but this isn’t just another messaging bill.

The Ellison-Lewis legislation would amend the National Labor Relations Act to include protections found under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to include labor organizing as a fundamental right. That would give workers a broader range of legal options if they feel discriminated against for trying to form a union.

Currently, their only redress is through a grievance with the National Labor Relations Board—an important process, but one that workers and labor analysts frequently criticize as both too slow and often too lenient on offending employers.
If the NLRA were amended, however, after 180 days a worker could take his or her labor complaint from the NLRB to a federal court. This is how the law works now for civil rights complaints, which gives workers the option, after 180 days, to step outside the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission process.

Then, workers would have sole discretion on whether to push a complaint, as opposed to relying on a decision by the NLRB on whether to forge ahead. Workers could also move the process along much faster than the NLRB handles complaints, which can often take years.

Ellison told The Nation that the legislation would also help workers recover more money—the NLRB will award back pay to a grieved worker minus whatever they earned while awaiting a decision, which can often amount to basically nothing. “[The NLRB] remedy, though useful and very important, and nothing in our legislation changes that, that remedy is considered slow and somewhat inadequate. For some of these union-busting law firms, [they] will say ‘so do it and we’ll just pay.’”
Ellison said he believes the labor movement needs to get back on the offensive. “With the Supreme Court in here, and what they just did in Harris v. Quinn and all the things they wrote about Abood, it’s insane to hope for the best,” he said, referring to the recent decision involving non-union public workers and their fee arrangements with unions. “I mean this Supreme Court is openly hostile to racial justice and worker justice simultaneously. So we better be moving out on both fronts.”

Ellison told MSNBC, which first reported the bill, that he got the idea from a book by Century Foundation fellows Richard Kahlenberg and Moshe Marvit, titled Why Union Organizing Should Be a Civil Right. They argue that the First Amendment’s right to free association should clearly include one of the most crucial forms of association—banding together to push back against unfair treatment from employers.
Marvit told The Nation he thinks treating labor organizing as a civil right is not only constitutionally appropriate but also much more appealing to the general public. “Civil rights is something that Americans really understand, and has a legitimacy that is sort of beyond reproach,” he said. “So when you put it in civil rights terms, it’s something that really speaks to people.” (In the interest of full disclosure, Marvit has written for The Nation in the past.)

“Frankly, I think Republicans have been saying it on the other side. That’s been the message of the National Right to Work Committee for sixty years, that workers have a civil right not to join a union,” Marvit continued. “And I think that’s been a successful argument for them. It taps into this notion of your freedom to choose.”

The Nation has learned that when Ellison and Lewis introduce the bill on Wednesday morning, they will boast eleven other original co-sponsors: Representatives Jerrold Nadler, John Conyers, Marcia Fudge, Barbara Lee, Mark Takano, Rush Holt, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Karen Bass, Danny Davis, Albio Sires and Janice Hahn. All of the co-sponsors are Democrats.

Major unions will also be on board. Both the AFL-CIO and the Change to Win coalition will back the bill, along with The United Food and Commercial Workers and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees.
Joseph Geevarghese, deputy director of Change to Win, told The Nation that his union was joining the push “because union organizing has been maligned. Unions have been maligned in our society. There is a value in re-defining what all of these tens of thousands of brave workers are doing as, “We have a fundamental right to stand up and speak out about injustice in this country.’”

http://www.thenation.com/blog/180792/house-bill-would-make-union-organizing-civil-right

Friday, July 25, 2014

Free Gaza. End the Blockade. End the Occupation. Call your representatives. Join your local protest. Boycott Sodastream.

Borrowed from AUPHR (Americans United for Palestinian Human Rights) website, our local Palestine Solidarity group.

1250 Protesters in Portland join global actions against the Massacre in Gaza

       
Friday, 25 July 2014 10:36


PORTLANDERS SAY "NO MORE US BOMBS ON IRAQ"

Written by Peace and Justice Works Iraq Affinity Group (IAG)
Friday, 25 July 2014 08:45

NEWS ITEM

For immediate release July 25, 2014


PORTLANDERS SAY "NO MORE US BOMBS ON IRAQ"
US Policy Stokes Flames of War from Libya and Israel/Palestine to
Pakistan and Ukraine
Saturday, July 26, 2014, 12:00 Noon, Terry Schrunk Plaza SW 3rd & Madison

At noon on Saturday, July 26, Portland area groups will gather
at Terry Schrunk Plaza, SW 3rd and Madison, across from Portland's
Federal Building, to raise the cry "No More US Bombs on Iraq."

As of July 9, President Obama had sent at least 800 US troops,
ostensibly "advisors," to Iraq.[1] Although it is claimed they
will not engage in combat, there has already been talk of using
drones, cruise missiles, and Apache attack helicopters piloted by some
of these "advisors."[2] The potential for the situation to engulf
a much broader conflict is heightened by the fact that Syria[3],
Iran[4], and Russia[5] already have actively engaged
militarily in Iraq on the same side the US wishes to support, even
though the US' position on those countries' stance in next door
Syria's civil war is completely opposite.
Read more: PORTLANDERS SAY "NO MORE US BOMBS ON IRAQ"

Get your PDX SodaStream Boycott petition here!

Written by Portland SodaStream Boycott Coalition
Thursday, 24 July 2014 14:54
Petition to stop selling SodaStream products
Please print out a copy and have your friends and family sign it!
Dear Target Galleria / Macy’s / Kitchen Kaboodle Store Manager,
As a person of conscience, I call on you to stop selling SodaStream carbonation devices

SodaStream devices are made in an Israeli settlement in occupied Palestine.
These settlements exploit Palestinian land, labor and resources.
They are illegal under international law and are obstacles to peace.







 

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

UK's Largest Union Backs Boycott of Israel

The largest Union in Britain, UNITE, endorsed a call to Boycott, Divest and Enact Sanctions (BDS) against Israel, because of its treatment and occupation of Palestine. Another article explains the BDS movement.
 
Jerry Lewis
July 6, 2014
 

UK's Largest Union Backs Boycott of Israel Despite Labor's Calls to Refrain
The union, which claims a membership of around 1.3 million, overwhelmingly carried two pro-Palestinian resolutions.
LONDON - UNITE, Britain's largest Trades Union - which last week confirmed it will be financially backing Labor Party leader Ed Miliband's bid for the premiership next May - has defied his recent call to not support the Boycott, Sanctions, and Divestment campaign against Israel.
At their annual conference held in the south coast resort of Brighton last week, they voted to support two hostile- to-Israel resolutions, including one that actively supports the BDS policy promoted by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
The union, which claims a membership of around 1.3 million, overwhelmingly carried two pro-Palestinian resolutions, while clearly rejecting a pro-Israeli motion. The third motion, from the Bank of England branch, proposed greater co-operation between UNITE and the Histradut by way of constructive dialogue and support for the Israeli union movement.
The main pro-Palestinian resolution calls for raising awareness, building support, campaigning, and lobbying for "a free and independent Palestine" by highlighting the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, the West Bank, and Israel itself.
A key section of the resolution instructs the union to work with others to develop campaigning and a "leverage strategy" around the BDS movement, including tackling "complicit companies" involved in the "occupation," the "apartheid wall," and "illegal settlements" "through workforce pressure, contracts, and pension funds," while encouraging members to call on supermarkets and retailers "to stop using companies that export goods from illegal settlements."
The union is also urged to raise the issue and table motions "in support of BDS" in other trades union forums around the world.
However, this flies in the face of Miliband who, after his pre Passover visit to Israel, told Labor Friends of Israel's annual lunch not three weeks ago that, as far as he is concerned, nothing but nothing should get in the way of peace.
And it was in that context that he added, "We are clear that the threat of boycotts of Israel is the wrong response.
We do and we will resolutely oppose the isolation of Israel. And my party does so."
While it was not the first time he indicated his view, he had not said so as explicitly as on this occasion.
However, complicating the issue was the decision announced at the beginning of last week that UNITE was to give the opposition Labor Party a further #12 million of much needed funding in preparation for the May 2015 general election.
The ruling Conservative Party leadership rubbed their hands with glee as they pointed to the prospect of the left-leaning union's boss Len McClusky having more influence over Labor Party policy because of the sponsorship. This is something that Miliband has been trying to deny and break away from since he won the election to become party leader in September 2010.
A senior Labor Party source told The Jerusalem Post Saturday night that Miliband is the party leader and what he says is party policy and nothing that UNITE discusses at its party conference will change that simple fact.
A Labor Party representative added: "Ed Miliband made both his and the Labor Party's position on this clear at a recent Labor Friends of Israel event.
That was his firm position then, and remains his firm position now."

Introducing the BDS Movement

The global movement for a campaign of Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) against Israel until it complies with international law and Palestinian rights was initiated by Palestinian civil society in 2005, and is coordinated by the Palestinian BDS National Committee (BNC), established in 2007. BDS is a strategy that allows people of conscience to play an effective role in the Palestinian struggle for justice.
For decades, Israel has denied Palestinians their fundamental rights of freedom, equality, and self-determination through ethnic cleansing, colonization, racial discrimination, and military occupation. Despite abundant condemnation of Israeli policies by the UN, other international bodies, and preeminent human rights organisations, the world community has failed to hold Israel accountable and enforce compliance with basic principles of law. Israel's crimes have continued with impunity.
In view of this continued failure, Palestinian civil society called for a global citizens' response. On July 9 2005, a year after the International Court of Justice's historic advisory opinion on the illegality of Israel's Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT), a clear majority of Palestinian civil society called upon their counterparts and people of conscience all over the world to launch broad boycotts, implement divestment initiatives, and to demand sanctions against Israel, until Palestinian rights are recognised in full compliance with international law.
The campaign for boycotts, divestment and sanctions (BDS) is shaped by a rights-based approach and highlights the three broad sections of the Palestinian people: the refugees, those under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and Palestinians in Israel. The call urges various forms of boycott against Israel until it meets its obligations under international law by:
Ending its occupation and colonization of all Arab lands occupied in June 1967 and dismantling the Wall; Recognizing the fundamental rights of the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel to full equality; and Respecting, protecting and promoting the rights of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and properties as stipulated in UN Resolution 194.
The BDS call was endorsed by over 170 Palestinian political parties, organizations, trade unions and movements. The signatories represent the refugees, Palestinians in the OPT, and Palestinian citizens of Israel.
Boycotts target products and companies (Israeli and international) that profit from the violation of Palestinian rights, as well as Israeli sporting, cultural and academic institutions. Anyone can boycott Israeli goods, simply by making sure that they don't buy produce made in Israel or by Israeli companies. Campaigners and groups call on consumers not to buy Israeli goods and on businesses not to buy or sell them.
Israeli cultural and academic institutions directly contribute to maintaining, defending or whitewashing the oppression of Palestinians, as Israel deliberately tries to boost its image internationally through academic and cultural collaborations. As part of the boycott, academics, artists and consumers are campaigning against such collaboration and 'rebranding'. A growing number of artists have refused to exhibit or play in Israel.
Divestment means targeting corporations complicit in the violation of Palestinian rights and ensuring that the likes of university investment portfolios and pension funds are not used to finance such companies. These efforts raise awareness about the reality of Israel's policies and encourage companies to use their economic influence to pressure Israel to end its systematic denial of Palestinian rights.
Sanctions are an essential part of demonstrating disapproval for a country's actions. Israel's membership of various diplomatic and economic forums provides both an unmerited veneer of respectability and material support for its crimes. By calling for sanctions against Israel, campaigners educate society about violations of international law and seek to end the complicity of other nations in these violations.
The BDS National Committee
The efforts to coordinate the BDS campaign, that began to grow rapidly as soon as/once the 2005 Call was made public, culminated in the first Palestinian BDS Conference held in Ramallah in November 2007. Out of this conference emerged the BDS National Committee (BNC) as the Palestinian coordinating body for the BDS campaign worldwide. See the BNC page for more details.
Posted by Portside on July 11, 2014

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Whither the Socialist Left? Round 2

Portside (a website of CCDS) aims to provide varied material of interest to people on the left that will help them to interpret the world, and to change it.

Last year Portside published Whither the Socialist Left? Thinking the "Unthinkable", which created a lot of controversy, discussion and debate. Now, the author has written an update "Whither the Socialist Left?

 
Mark Solomon
Portside
June 25, 2014
 
Equality, democratic rights, expanding democracy, labor, peace, the unity of the 99%, and socialism are streams in a mighty river. image from Socialist Party, USA
 
June 6, 2014 marked the first anniversary of the forum sponsored by the Left Labor Project and other groups to explore left unity -- especially among a sector of socialist organizations responding to a Portside article advocating such unity that appeared in March 2013. [Whither the Socialist Left? Thinking the "Unthinkable" .]

An unexpectedly large audience (that required a change of venue) reflected a strong desire on the left for a convergence of generally like-minded organizations.
Unfortunately, panelists who represented their organizations did not forcefully express such interest. Except for opening remarks that attempted to frame the unity concept and a statement supporting unity by the publisher of Jacobin, the presentations by other panelists were marked by tepid and qualified responses to proposed cooperation. One panelist pleaded that her organization was making headway among students and was hesitant to be distracted by a unity project. Another speaker declared that unity first arises out of struggle. (One could respond that struggle arises out of unity.) Another speaker traced his organization's history of failed strategies and while his group was open to cooperation, it preferred for the moment to go its own way.

From those quarters, the fruit of such uninspired responses is a year of little or no movement to build a unified and cohesive socialist left. But varied and at times unanticipated expressions of left and left-center unity did happen in the past year. There have been significant gains for collaboration and joint action. Those gains have been marked by degrees of convergence among movements fighting austerity and for economic survival, fighting environmental catastrophe, and movements opposing wars and militarization. The inseparable links between those pressing concerns, and alliances based upon them, is opening a path to broader, more effective movements and to a deeper understanding of the systemic nature of the interlocking crises facing the country.

Perhaps the most portentous development has been the African American-led Moral Monday movement that arose out of struggle against right wing North Carolina legislative attempts to suppress the right to vote, slash Medicaid, increase taxes on working people and strip away the rights of workers, women and the LGBT community.

Moral Monday has now spread through a rising South to Georgia, South Carolina, Florida, Alabama and Missouri - now moving north to Indiana. It has responded to those assaults with large-scale civil disobedience and massive marches -- building upon the intersecting interests of class, race and gender and centered upon defending the rights and interests of the multiracial working class and its allies. The movement is a prime example of coalition building described by past NAACP leader Benjamin Jealous "as the key to [achieving] transformative power."
New alliances are emerging in Mississippi, combining to fight back against voter suppression and attempts to undermine women's reproductive rights. The Freedom Summer 50th Anniversary observance has challenged the effectiveness of "isolated issues," opting instead for a broad coalition-centered emphasis on the intersecting issues of education, voting rights, women's rights and healthcare.

The projected People's Climate March in September at the United Nations aimed at mobilizing a mass demonstration commensurate with the depth of the environmental crisis has linked the battle for clean air, jobs and "an economy that works for all people" to fighting climate change. The Call to Action has stated emphatically: "this is the moment to bring our different movements together, articulate our common challenges and solutions - and go big."

Leading peace organizations such as United for Peace and Justice and Peace Action have consistently stressed the linkages between a stagnating economy and wasteful military spending - stressing the need for major stimulus spending to create jobs, dismantle a fossil fuel infrastructure and build a sustainable green economy instead of a regressive and provocative militarized economy.

An important current is the reemergence of class as fundamental - underpinning and intersecting a range of identity-based movements. Growing fight back against low wages in the fast food industry and giant big box retailers is stimulating, and in some cases, converging with the resistance of highly exploited part-time, contingency and adjunct workers in academia and other fields. Responding to deep structural change in the economy that is driving the impoverishment of millions of jobless and under-employed workers (including legions of contingent college teachers, students ground down by debt, highly exploited student athletes, etc.), some labor unions are adopting new forms of struggle - stirring a latent spirit of "social unionism," reaching into working class communities to support emerging workers' centers and other creative ways of organizing in a society that has suffered for decades from relentless efforts to undermine the trade union movement.

Campaigns to increase the minimum wage have become cornerstones of the fight back against growing working class impoverishment. Those battles are inevitably linked to the struggle against racism and against the historic super-exploitation of African Americans. They embrace the long battles of women for equality in wages and in the workplace. They promise to reach into depressed-wage farming, advancing the interests of largely Latino workers - building unity with undocumented workers and promoting progressive immigration reform. Crucially, the living wage movement holds out a hope, however dim at the moment, that white male workers, many of whom have given backbone to the right wing, will begin to abandon false resentments against rising national and racial groups and start to reassert their natural class interests in joining with their working class sisters and brothers in the fight for social and economic justice.

Mainly absent from those promising developments is a strong, politically mature and unified socialist organization/movement/party to assist in providing clarity, direction and ideological depth to emerging struggles.
Yet, objective circumstances continue to suggest significant growth of anti-capitalist sentiment shading into as yet dimly perceived socialist sympathies. For youth in particular, the standard assumption that their acquired resources would exceed those of their parents has been demolished by systemic economic stagnation, generating a stirring consciousness of the intractable flaws of capitalism. That explains in considerable measure the unprecedented success of Thomas Piketty's Capitalism in the 21st Century, a 700-page academic exploration of the bases for growing inequality. Whatever, Piketty's methodical flaws or the limited nature of his proposed nostrums, his fundamental thesis that the rate of return on invested wealth far outstrips economic growth, causing deep endemic inequality - has struck a powerfully responsive chord among an unexpectedly (and unprecedented) large audience.

There are varying signs of an increasing socialist and left consciousness. Growing interest and engagement in the theoretically challenging Online University of the Left is a vivid example of expanding involvement in left and socialist ideas. The continued growth of the annual Left Forum, the growing annual Labor Notes conference, the innovative youth-oriented Jacobin journal and various large gatherings with socialism as a unifying theme - all give concreteness to a sense of rising interest in left ideas.
On an organizational plane, there are promising developments - prominently among them the emergence of LeftRoots, a gathering of activists in a variety of vital struggles who "see the need for a new vision of transformative and liberatory socialism." Of great significance, LeftRoots stresses building an organization rooted largely in "people of color/oppressed nationalities, the working class, LGBT folks and other marginalized peoples" who must be at the core "of any successful movement to challenge the hegemony of capital, white supremacy, hetero-patriarchy and imperialism."

The Left Labor Project in New York energetically seeks to build broad working class participation in accelerating battles for economic justice, environmental sustainability and to reinvigorate the spirit of social unionism.
Left Strategies is a gathering place for labor activists to address how left organizers and activists can "adapt our work to step up to the demands of our rapidly changing historic moment." Bill Fletcher's voice in Left Strategies' explorations is representative of the richness of its discussions. In a recent exchange, Fletcher pointed out that while "the form and nature of a national Left organization in the USA," is as yet undetermined, Left activists have a pivotal role in advancing a "worldview" that offers a framework for working people to understand and thus transform reality. There is a compelling need to help "people understand . the nature of the system," the nature of the enemy, the nature of potential allies and the "directions we can pursue towards victory (or victories.)"
Fletcher then discusses social justice unionism. For the Left, that means confronting capitalism beyond trade union consciousness "or even economic justice alone." Social justice means advocacy for all who are oppressed; it includes meeting the challenge of environmental catastrophe and the survival of the planet. Social justice means a concrete labor movement strategy to address the special role and significance of African Americans; it means addressing the growing major status of women in the work force. It is the Left . that has the historic responsibility . to shatter racist oppression, gender oppression, homophobia, etc., "and insist on a transformational approach aimed not only at . the destruction of these various forms of oppression, but the construction of a popular, democratic bloc that can win and hold power."
Important advances for progressive policies and ideas have marked the electoral arena in the past year led by municipal victories for coalescing progressive forces New York, Boston and other locales. Further to the left, the election of Kshama Sawant, a member of the Socialist Alternatives organization, to the Seattle City Council, driven largely by emphatic advocacy of a fifteen-dollar minimum wage provided vivid evidence that an articulate, effective advocate for an advanced progressive agenda and a socialist perspective can win.

There are also indications of leftward movement among left-center organizations like the Center for American Progress, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, MoveOn, People for American Way and others. Generally, those organizations have been supportive of the movement for a living wage, recognizing the central issue of inequality first advanced by the Occupy movement. They have grasped the seriousness of the far right challenge and have sought to coalesce broad opposition to the Tea Party and other right wing formations. They have stood for a progressive immigration policy. They have been increasingly critical of Washington's interventionism and have stressed diplomatic alternatives to the use of force.
Those are all promising, positive developments. But despite signs of upsurge, the broad progressive community remains largely fragmented, lacking a coherent overarching vision (a "worldview" articulated above by Bill Fletcher) that would not only react to recurring crises, but offer ideas and values to guide and illuminate the road to more transforming change.
Largely missing from the political landscape is that strong, unified left/socialist voice, well positioned to offer effective leadership to present struggles and that compelling vision of social change. There is no intent here to denigrate the work of the four organizations (Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, Democratic Socialists of America, Communist Party USA and Freedom Road Socialist Organization) that came together for discussion one year ago. They are all making important contributions and under present circumstances are perhaps experiencing some growth. However, the political will to make a dramatic break with the old "silos" into which some are sealed remains absent.

That is especially disappointing in light of signs of potential for broadening the cooperation of socialist organizations. The Labor Notes conferences and the Chicago-based "Socialism 2014" gatherings have been sparked by socialist organizations that in the past have shown little or no interest in cooperation with others. Yet, they have recently opened the platforms that they influence to a variety of left voices - showing new signs of an ecumenical spirit that suggests in some measure the long range possibility of a broad left/socialist alliance similar to Syriza in Greece, the Left Party in Germany and the new Podemos alliance in Spain. Under the clouds of growing European crisis of joblessness and under-employment, those alliances have achieved unprecedented breadth even embracing sworn enemies in the past.

Of course, we are a long way from such collaboration in the USA. The failure of even like-minded left and socialist groups to find ways to work together has been dispiriting to some who have foresworn efforts to build unity among unresponsive organizations. A few on the left are turning to inter-generational dialog, sensing potential for significant progress through communication between older activists and newly engaged young people in Jacobin discussion groups and in emerging organizations and projects like LeftRoots, Left Labor Project, etc.

Given the depth and intractable nature of the a system in crisis, no longer able to offer a better life to present and future generations; a system dogged by stagnation with only military muscle to confront vast changes in global power relations - there is little doubt that out of present turmoil and struggle new forces will emerge to create new ideas and new forms for building left unity. For existing left/socialist organizations, the train may be leaving the station. Yet, their experience is needed to help give depth, "worldview," and the tenacity of political long distance runners to the struggles bursting all over. Let's hope it's not too late.

[Mark Solomon is past national Co-Chair of the Committees of the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. He is author of The Cry Was Unity: Communists and African Americans 1917-1936 and is editor of Victor Grossman's Crossing the River: A memoir of the American Left, the Cold War, and life in East Germany. He is currently an associate at the W.E.Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research at Harvard University.]
Posted by Portside on June 26, 2014

Tuesday, June 24, 2014

‘$10.10 is Not Enough,’ Federal Contract Workers Tell Obama by Bruce Vail


Working In These Times







Email this article to a friend








Friday, Jun 13, 2014, 6:18 pm,  from In These Times
Monica Martinez (right with microphone) addresses a crowd of federal contract workers in Washington, D.C. Martinez' demand for the right to unionize is being supported by Sister Simone Campbell (center) of "Nun On The Bus" fame. Good Jobs Nation


The labor federation Change to Win is urging President Barack Obama to do more to help low-wage workers employed by private contractors at federal installations.

Yesterday, some 50 workers and supporters involved with Change to Win’s Good Jobs Nation campaign rallied at the entrance to the Smithsonian Institute’s National Air & Space Museum. Chanting “$10.10 is not enough,” the group called on Obama to issue a new executive order that would require private businesses with government contracts to negotiate union agreements with their workers.

Earlier this year, Obama issued a similar order raising the minimum wage to $10.10 an hour for federal contractors, following agitation by Good Jobs Nation. Now, the campaign is hoping that Obama will go further; according to Good Job Nation organizer Paco Fabian, an executive order encouraging union organizing has long been a goal of some labor activists, who point to cases where some anti-union government contractors have suppressed union organizing campaigns using public funds.

“We need a living wage and benefits,” says Yesenia Vega, a worker at a McDonald’s restaurant located at the Pentagon office building right outside Washington, D.C. At her workplace, she tells Working In These Times, “the managers are always telling us they’ll cut our hours,” so a union contract is needed to ensure a stable income. She and other workers at the Pentagon’s McDonald’s are also seeking decent health insurance, vacation benefits and paid sick days, none of which are currently available to them. “We need a union to get these things,” she says.

Vega and others workers addressing the rally did not specify which union they hoped to join. But it’s likely that the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), one of the founding members of the Change to Win federation, would take the lead in organizing fast-food workers, as it has done in the “Fight for 15” campaign demanding a $15 minimum wage and a union at fast-food restaurants nationwide.

Joining the workers was Sister Simone Campbell—a Catholic social justice activist best known as author of A Nun on the Bus: How All of Us Can Create Hope, Change, and Communitywho delivered a statement backing the demonstrators:
I strongly support a key element of President Obama’s agenda, which is to raise the minimum wage. Ultimately, the minimum wage should be a living wage – providing low-wage workers with what they need to rise out of poverty and care for their families. That is justice. I hope the president will now go further and allow these federal contract workers the freedom to form a union and bargain collectively with their employers.
“Unions benefit women,” Sister Campbell continued to cheers from the largely female crowd, asserting that unionized Hispanic and African American women earn better wages than non-union female workers.

Change to Win's Fabian explains that a new federal policy granting broader collective-bargaining rights to government contract workers has long been a goal of labor advocates because it could have broad impact in improving working conditions throughout the economy. Some worker activists were disappointed that such language was not included when the White House drafted the minimum wage executive order early this year, Fabian says, but were eager to see the wage proposal move forward as a first step.

“We didn’t think that complaining about the unionization part made a lot of sense when the president was getting ready to sign the executive order on $10.10,” he says. “We are happy he did that and we appreciate it. But now it’s time to move forward.”

Bruce Vail is a Baltimore-based freelance writer with decades of experience covering labor and business stories for newspapers, magazines and new media. He was a reporter for Bloomberg BNA's Daily Labor Report, covering collective bargaining issues in a wide range of industries, and a maritime industry reporter and editor for the Journal of Commerce, serving both in the newspaper's New York City headquarters and in the Washington, D.C. bureau.

Wednesday, June 4, 2014


THE COLOR OF WEALTH

the growing racial economic divide

 

A conversation with Meizhu Lui discussing why racism is critical to U.S. capitalism & how this affects a strategy for U.S. socialists



 

Date: Saturday, June 7th, 2014

Time: 1:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.

Location: Salem Public Library - Anderson  Rm. A

                 585 Liberty St. SE, Salem, Oregon

 

 

Meizhu Lui is a self-described “professional troublemaker,” labor, civil rights, and community activist. She co-authored The Color of Wealth: The Story behind the US Racial Wealth Divide. She emerged as a rank and file union activist in AFSCME and became the first elected Asian president of a local union in Massachusetts. She is a member of Freedom Road Socialist Organization (FRSO).

 

Sponsored by Oregon Socialist Renewal: oregonsocialistrenewal.blogspot.com  

 

Monday, May 19, 2014

Phillip Agnew video

Director of Dream Defenders Phillip Agnew and leader of United We Dream Sofia Campos were ready to represent our generation at the commemorative events of the 50th Anniversary of the March on Washington. But at the last minute, they were cut from the speaking roster because of "time". Published on Aug 29, 2013


Sunday, May 18, 2014

Capitalism and Women and Can Socialism Become An Alternative Form Of Civilization?

We had a very engaging Willamette Reds meeting today. Two of the issues we struggled with today concerned, at their roots, economics and localism and the question of self-determination in the context of how capitalism is evolving, although we did not state these issues exactly in those terms. What are the roots of capitalism and what can be or form the practical basis of socialism? How have human beings evolved? How does or doesn't Marxism-Leninism speak to people of color and women directly? And how does this impact the struggles that we all have with egoism?

The following essays come from the Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK) and take up these themes. The PKK leadership has stepped outside of traditional Marxism and has largely abandoned Leninism while taking up these questions in a revolutionary context. The applicability of this theoretical work is being tested right now in the revolution taking place in Rojava.

The PKK considers itself to be a social system as well as a leading force in the Kurdish liberation struggle. And it goes further by projecting itself as a liberation movement which can reach across the Middle East.

Can socialism be built outside of Marxism-Leninism? Can a successful revolution be built outside of Marxism-Leninism? Can regions which have not experienced capitalist development build socialism when there is no socialist center or country or a vanguard party built on Marxist-Leninist principles? The PKK leadership says that this is indeed possible.




 Abdullah Öcalan

A realistic definition of capitalism should not present it as a constant created and characterised by unicentral thought and action. It is, in essence, the actions of opportunist individuals and groups who established themselves into openings and cracks within society as the potential for surplus product developed; these actions became systematised as they nibbled away the social surplus.

These individuals and groups never number more than one or two percent of society. Their strength is in their opportunism and organisational skills. Their victory relies not only on their organisational skills but also on their control of the required objects and fluctuation of prices at the point where supply and demand intersect. If the official social forces do not suppress them; if, instead, these forces borrow from their profiteering giving their continuous support in return, then these groups who exist on the margins of all societies may legitimise themselves as the new masters of society. Throughout the history of civilisation, especially in Middle Eastern societies, these marginal groups of broker-profiteers have always existed. But because of society’s hatred of them, they could never find the courage to come into the daylight from the fissures they resided in. Not even the most despotic administrators had the courage to legitimise these groups. They were not just scorned, but seen as the most dangerous corruptive power; their ethics were considered the root of all evil. And indeed, the un surpassed wave of wars, plunders, massacres and exploitation originating from Western Europe over the last four hundred years, is largely a result of the capitalist system’s hegemony. (But then, the biggest counter-struggle also took place in Western Europe, hence it cannot be considered a total loss for humanity.)

Capitalism and the nation-state represent the dominant male in its most institutionalised form. Capitalist society is the continuation and culmination of all the old exploitative societies. It is a continuous warfare against society and woman. To put it succinctly, capitalism and nation-state are the monopolism of the tyrannical and exploitative male.
Breaking down this monopolism will perhaps be more difficult than breaking down the atom. A main objective of capitalist modernity’s ideological hegemony is to obliterate the historic and social facts concerning its conception and its essence. This is because the capitalist economic and societal form is not a social and historical necessity; it is a construct, forged through a complex process. Religion and philosophy have been transformed into nationalism, the divinity of the nationstate. The ultimate goal of its ideological warfare is to ensure its monopoly on thought. Its main weapons to accomplish this are religionism, gender discrimination and scientism as a positivist religion. Without ideological hegemony, with political and military oppression alone, maintaining modernity will be impossible. While capitalism uses religionism to control society’s cognisance, it uses nationalism to control classes and citizenship, a phenomenon that has risen around capitalism.

The objective of gender discrimination is to deny women any hope of change. The most effective way for sexist ideology to function, is by entrapping the male in power relations and by rendering woman impotent through constant rape. Through positivist scientism, capitalism neutralises the academic world and the youth. It convinces them that they have no choice but to integrate with the system, and in return for concessions this integration is assured.

As with all oppressive and exploitative social systems, capitalism could not rise without establishing a state. Whereas the dogmatism of the feudal system had a religious character, that of the archaic slave owning society had a mythological character. One god was embodied in the king and dynasty; but today god is presented as the invisible power in the state’s noble existence.

When capitalism saw the opportunity to become a system, it started off by eliminating all societies based on the mother-woman culture. During early modernity, the strength of female sociality that was still trying to maintain itself was burnt on the stake of the witch-hunter. In order to establish its hegemony over woman through her profound enslavement, these burnings were very useful tools. Woman is at the service of the system today partly because of the wide-spread burning of woman at the onset of capitalism. The embedded fear of the stake has put women in Europe under the total servitude of the man.

After eliminating women, the system mercilessly demolished the agrarian and village society. As long as the communal democratic character of society stands, capitalism cannot attain maximum power and profits. Thus, this kind of sociality was inevitably targeted. In this way, the complete entrapment of the oldest slave, woman, became the model for all other enslaved lives – that of children and men.

Political and military power play quite an important role in maintaining the capitalist system’s hegemony. But what is crucial is to possess and subsequently to paralyse society via the cultural industry. The mentality of communities under the influence of the system has weakened and its members have be come gullible.

Many philosophers claim that society has been turned into a society of the spectacle, similar to the zoo. The sex, sports, arts and culture industries, in combination and in sequence, bombard the emotional and analytic intelligence incessantly by means of a diverse spread of advertisements. As a result, both emotional and analytical intelligence have become completely dysfunctional; the conquering of society’s mentality is thus complete.

What is of grave concern is society’s voluntary acceptance of its captivity by the combined cultural and sex industries, and moreover, perceiving this as a burst of freedom! This is the strongest base and tool of legitimisation the rulers have. Capitalism can only reach the empire phase with the aid of the cultural industry. Therefore, the struggle against the cultural hegemony requires the most difficult struggle of all: mental struggle. Until we can develop and organise the essence and form of a counter-struggle against the cultural war waged by the system through its invasions, assimilation and industrialisation, not a single struggle for freedom, equality and democracy has a chance to succeed.

Capitalist modernity is a system based on the denial of love. Its denial of society, unrestrained individualism, gender discrimination in all areas, deification of money, substitution of god with the nation-state, and turning woman into an automaton that receives no or little wages, mean that there are no material grounds for love either. 

Can Socialism Become An Alternative Form Of Civilization?

Abdullah Öcalan

Socialist ideology, and the socialist system it created in opposition to the capitalist system, failed to become a different civilisation. Whether as a result of its ideological identity, or as a result of its premature birth or its mistakes, it failed to transform the longing for freedom and equality of the labourers and peoples into a differentiated development of civilisation. Despite claims for this, in the end it did not go beyond state capitalism. Numerous ideological tendencies and social movements similar to this have emerged in history. Although based on religious grounds and tribal regimes, the departures of the prophets Abraham and Moses represented tribal socialism in their initial form. Societies that were overwhelmed, replaced and terrorized, especially under the Assyrian hegemony during the antiquity in the Middle East, were only able to continue their existence in collective life forms as mystical religious orders. What is more, the clerical regimes of Sumer and Egypt were the first sacred examples of state socialism. They led the way to civilisation through state economies that somehow seem to resemble the Soviet regime. The Neolithic society prior to this was arranged as a communal society, which centred round the mother-woman. This social regime, which can be described as primitive socialism, did not know state establishment, and it existed for thousands of years. It was this regime that fermented humanity. It reverberated in the idea of paradise that continually nurtured human dreams of equality and freedom.

Jesus Christ, and indeed the Christian movement of the first three centuries, offered the most shining example of religious socialism, both in length and in essence. The educators of this period represented ideology and practice in their personalities to such an extent that until that period they were rarely equaled.

The departure of Islam, too, is among the foremost examples of the communal form. The equality and respect that existed amongst its members took the form of a sacred family. In its pure form the religious community (ummah) is a kind of feudal socialism. After both Christianity and Islam had reached state level the function of individual persons and dynasties increased and the religious community would distance itself from communal socialism. The increased importance of private property degenerated the initial socialist character and turned it into simply a hollow ideological shell. As a reaction to this privatisation, a large number of sects and religious orders continued their purity and their collective lives for a lengthy period. The numerous seemingly religious movements of the Middle Ages were in fact the collective orders of the oppressed that were opposed to the exploiting and dominant regimes. The weakness of their technological foundations prevented these movements from becoming alternative regimes based on equality and freedom. Despite the fact that some of them existed for hundreds of years, and that some even became political authorities at state level, their inability to become a model of civilisation is related to the weakness of their scientific-technological foundations. In addition in their essential ideological identities they were based on a class society model. Consequently they only epitomised the desire for equality and freedom in their dreams. On this basis they directed themselves towards sacred and human love, nurtured the dream of heaven, kept fraternal feelings alive, and transformed these into a powerful moral and literary tradition.


Even at the birth of capitalism Mores’ ‘Utopia’ and Campanella’s ‘Country of the Sun’ represented the dream of an ideal socialism. Numerous individuals and societies heroically fought against religious dogmatism in the name of the freedom that gave birth to capitalism. In their struggles they did not have any doubt in their minds that they were fighting for equality, freedom and fraternity, and not for the subjection of other people as servants to their individual passions. The fundamental slogan of the French bourgeois revolution was ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity’.

And Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the founders of scientific socialism, stated without any hesitation that they had established their ideological identity by taking from the movements of German philosophy, French socialism, and the English working class movement. Even this brief narrative indicates that labourers and oppressed peoples always fought for a communal life based on fraternity and an ideology that encompassed equality and freedom, that they suffered for it, and heroically resisted, from the primitive communal regime of the Neolithic era until the stage of scientific socialism. If they were unable to establish the regimes they deserved, the reason for this was neither lack of conviction nor insufficient struggle but the lack of the technological circumstances with which to reach their sacred aim. It was because of their technological backwardness that they were condemned to the civilisation of class society.

The working class movement under the guidance of the Communist Manifesto was the last link of equality and freedom in this chain of history. The authors of the manifesto were aware of the utopian character of the movements prior to theirs. For this reason they made a diligent effort to be scientific. However their scientific nature was restricted to their era. Capitalism was going through its most mature age and it had just started to encounter crises. It had immense self-confidence. It claimed that history began with capitalism, and that this was destined for eternity. No matter how scientific it was, this socialism could not yet step solidly on the ground. The working class movement was at its infant stage. There was no sign of a liberation movement in the colonies. Despite this, they were not reluctant to courageously declare the class stance both ideologically and practically by establishing the First and Second Internationals during the second half of the 19th century. The aspect in their stance that deserved respect was their relentless struggle for and defense of workers’ rights. That was the prophetic aspect of their stance. The talk of such periods could not have been a debate about whether the strategy was suitable or not. In his rebellion against the terrible regime of Rome, Jesus was not in a position to think about strategy and tactics, and he was without any weapon other than his firm belief in his god. However, he did not have the slightest hesitation in taking the step forward that was meant to enable humanity to enter into a stage of infinite freedom, which did become a significant step in history. Steps of this nature were always granted sanctity. The movements of the founding heroes of socialism, and their initial social basis, also deserve such sanctity. Political successes or bitter losses were secondary issues in comparison with the essence of their struggles
.


The failure of the Paris Commune and the collapse of the Second International did not prevent scientific socialism from further embracing its aims, and in the Leninist stage it achieved a great political strength and state power. In the classical definition, one third of the world declared that the proletariat and oppressed nations had made the transition to the age of socialist civilisation. It laid claim to being in competition with capitalism in all spheres of life. For the first time in history the republics of equality and the freedom of the oppressed truly showed their strength by standing on their own feet for a lengthy period. However, these republics collapsed, they lost their historical significance before the end of the 20th century without lasting even a hundred years. Whilst the propaganda motivated scientists of the bourgeoisie declared this development to be the bankruptcy of socialism, Marxists judged the same development to represent various forms of betrayal, and those who piously believe in socialism regarded it as the collapse of their sacred dreams. More sober minded and genuinely scientific approaches concluded that both the great disappointment and the betrayal theories were easy options based on subjective judgment. Whatever had happened was expected to happen. Dreams and desires had collapsed because they did not fulfill or represent what was expected of them. As opposed to being disenchanted or pleased about this, the method of science has always been to question where the truth lies, and to find a path to success.

The Soviet experiment has not been subjected to analysis in depth, and, even more significantly, all the outcomes of its collapse have not yet become apparent. Various matters are still in the dark, and are waiting for a new era. Despite this, the factors that are already apparent indicate the failures of the philosophy and practice. The questioning of whether the practice was socialism, or nationalism, was freedom, or totalitarianism, or was equality or state capitalism is just beginning. These questions do not belittle the genuine historical importance of the struggle of millions of labourers and numerous heroes, who upheld the belief and consciousness of scientific socialism, and they do not suggest that these struggles were in vain. On the contrary, as the only correct path through which to own up to these values, this questioning points out the indispensable importance of the correct analysis of this practice, filtering it through the sieve of science. Without successfully completing this task successful progress towards achieving the sacred aims of freedom and equality cannot be possible.

History has often witnessed grave errors, which have led to the exact opposite of the desired outcomes being fought for. It will happen again. As long as human life forms exist, they will understand how to arrive at a more correct scientific expression of the noble ideals of equality and freedom and will ensure a decisive advance along the correct path and achieve success.


We honor Towards A New Dawn for making the second essay available.

Saturday, May 3, 2014

URGENT APPEAL: Trade Unionists Under Attack in Ukraine

The Right Sector fascist movement has begun an unprovoked attack on trade unionists in the Ukrainian cities of Kiev and Odessa. They have burned the trade union headquarters in both cities. In Odessa 38 people have died and the number of deaths is rising. Some were burned and later died from their injuries after being forced to crawl in the street by the fascists, and some were trapped inside and died from smoke inhalation. Follow the link to the video report:

http://rt.com/news/156480-odessa-fire-protesters-dead/

vkp_logo
The US Friends of the Soviet People calls on all trade unionists to call on their unions to demand that the violence against their fellow workers in the Ukraine cease immediately, and that the United State immediately withdraw its support for the illegal Ukrainian fascist regime.

Call the AFL–CIO President Richard Trumka at (202) 637-5000 or contact him:via the web: http://www.aflcio.org/Contact-Us

THE MORE OF US THAT SPEAK UP THE BETTER IT WILL BE FOR PEACE AND A RETURN TO DEMOCRACY IN UKRAINE! DO IT NOW! EACH DAY MORE OF OUR COMRADES ARE BEING KILLED BY FASCIST HOOLIGANS THAT OPERATE OUTSIDE OF THE RULE OF LAW. MANY OF THE VICTIMS OF THE VIOLENCE ARE VETERANS OF WW II AND SERVED WITH DISTINCTION IN THE BATTLE AGAINST NAZI FASCISM. THE AFL-CIO MUST DO ITS PART TO SPEAK UP FOR ALL TRADE UNIONISTS! WE CANNOT BE SILENT!