Saturday, March 24, 2018

ABCs of Socialism, Part 1: What is socialism? What is capitalism?


What is socialism? At the most basic level, the essence of socialism lies in worker sovereignty, the idea that those who do the work should also make the decisions. We cannot be free so long as we hold no real power in the workplace. What does worker sovereignty mean in practical terms? We can begin to answer this question by first defining just what we mean by a worker. It might seem obvious- a worker is someone who…works. However, in socialist thinking, we must be more specific. In socialist terms, a worker is someone who must support themselves by selling their labor, their time and energy, to someone else. When you work at a job for someone else, you are selling your labor. The workers in society make up a group with common economic interests, a class- the working class. Who do we sell our labor to? The purchasers of labor in society comprise a class that supports itself by owning property: stores, factories, mills, apartments, etc. Another name for this property is capital. The owning class gets its name, capitalist, from its ownership of capital. Capitalists obtain their wealth by buying labor, then selling the product of that labor at a profit. Let’s look at an example. Think of your phone: it was made by a factory laborer (worker); it was designed by an engineer (worker); it was shipped by a trucker (worker); it was stocked and sold by a salesperson (worker). At each step, a worker contributes his or her labor to the process of production. Yet, the final price of the phone is greater than the labor cost to produce it (material costs are also labor costs- extracting and processing raw materials also involves labor). Where does this ‘extra’ portion of the sale price go? To the capitalist, who contributes nothing to the process of making and selling your phone, and furthermore, has a great incentive to pay the lowest possible price for labor and thereby maximize profits. 

In other words, this:



Depends on this:




And this:




That’s why socialists also have another name for profit, surplus value, meaning the unearned value extracted by a capitalist from workers’ labor. It is this fact, not some nebulous sense of ‘unfairness’ or ‘social justice’ that leads socialists to rightly call the system of surplus value extraction, capitalism, an exploitative system. Only worker sovereignty, socialism, can bring an end to this system of capitalist exploitation. Under socialism, society’s capital, the factories, mills, stores, and so forth, would not be controlled by capitalists, but by workers. A revolutionary new form of management would come about- instead of dictatorial bosses and secretive ‘human resource’ operatives, workplaces would be administered by elected workers’ councils. Firms would be run, not in the interest of a tiny cabal of wealthy investors, but in the interest of those who do the work of creating society’s wealth. Socialism may sound utopian to many readers, but the reality is that there are no other paths to freedom for US workers. Either we can continue as we have done and see ourselves sink lower and lower into the tyranny of the profit system, or we can adopt a new way of thinking that can set us free.

Saturday, March 3, 2018

A Belated Response to 'Are we Standing by...'

We cannot afford to fight against each imperialist aggression in detail. We must instead take a broader approach against imperialism, one that will move the consciousness of the masses forward. Imperialism relies upon the unchallenged assumptions of national chauvinist ideology among the US and European masses to maintain its political base. Attacking this base of ideological support will weaken imperialism everywhere. Why is this the best approach?

1. Our political reach and resources are limited. We do not have the resources to directly support every freedom struggle around the world; we must be more focused in our work. Being socialists and communists in the United States, our main enemy is not US imperialism in Ukraine or Turkey, but US imperialism in the US. Our main task, therefore, is to attack imperialism's base of support among the broad masses in the United States. We do this by connecting in general terms the vast wealth squandered on imperialist interference, both military and non-military, to the crises affecting working people in the US.

2. . To a greater or lesser degree, all sections of the US working class find themselves under the thrall of national chauvinism; we cannot underestimate how deeply ingrained the ideas of national and cultural supremacy are in the minds of the broad masses in the US. Under such conditions, any appeal to internationalism can easily be twisted to serve a 'humanitarian' imperialist narrative. Witness the success of the Trotskyites in doing just that in the US and UK time and again. Instead, building up support for national self-determination and sovereignty will meet the masses where they are and begin moving their thinking forward.

3. In the context of the deeply held national chauvinism of the masses in the world's most powerful imperialist country, the demand that the state respect national self-determination and sovereignty becomes a radical demand, one that can profoundly affect the fortunes of progressive humanity around the world.

4. We should avoid being drawn into a multitude of debates over the precise character of this or that movement or government and whether the aforesaid deserve our support and solidarity. The subtext of such debates is that foreign peoples who do not organize themselves in 'correct', Western leftist-approved ways do not deserve solidarity and should be left to imperialism's mercy. The principled approach is to oppose all imperialist intervention, regardless of what we think of its target.

5. Does this mean that exposing the individual crimes of imperialism is unimportant? It does not. Rather, it means that 'Respect national sovereignty!' is an appropriate mass slogan given current objective conditions in the US, while 'Victory to the enemies of imperialism!' is not. By adopting the former position, we have the greatest chance of weakening imperialism in the US and moving the US working class toward true internationalism.

6. Does this position pander to the 'privilege and ignorance' of the US working class? It does not. It acknowledges the relative backwardness of the US working class and seeks to begin addressing it in a systematic way. One cannot begin with differential calculus when teaching mathematics; if our aim is to educate, we must understand our student's strengths and weaknesses first.